Even though dignity is a very broad idea, the CCLA and many others believe that the idea of human dignity protects some very specific rights for queer students in schools, including the right to use your chosen name and pronouns in most school situations. Using proper names and pronouns for transgender, gender diverse, and non-binary students is essential to promoting human dignity and equality, and respecting people for who they are. There may be specific exceptions to a school’s ability to use your chosen name and pronouns, such as on your official documents and where doing so would compromise your privacy (see the Privacy section for more).
All of Canada’s provinces and territories acknowledge 2SLGBTQIA+ inclusion in schools with varying levels of detail.
Some provinces have specific guidelines for schools regarding use of chosen names and pronouns. This chart provides more information on the situation in specific provinces.
As part of suite of anti-transgender laws targeting healthcare, sports, and education, Alberta passed the Education Amendment Act, 2024 restricting chosen name and pronoun usage in schools. As of 2025, Egale Canada and Skipping Stone have launched constitutional challenges against both the legislation that bans gender-affirming healthcare for minors, as well as the education policy that forcibly outs students to their parents or guardians when they request that a new preferred name or pronoun be used by school staff.
The Government of Saskatchewan introduced similar laws around name and pronouns through the Parents’ Bill of Rights in 2023. This law also requires a parent’s permission for teachers or school staff to use a trans or gender diverse student’s chosen name or pronouns, thus forcibly outing students to their parents or guardians. The Government used section 33 of the Charter to pass this law, knowing that it was likely unconstitutional. Section 33 of the Charter is also called the Notwithstanding Clause and it allows a government to declare that any law can operate for a certain period of time despite the fact that the law may violate certain Charter rights.
Egale Canada and UR Pride, a Regina non-profit, have challenged this law, however because the Notwithstanding Clause has been used to pass the law, unfortunately a court does not have the ability to strike the law down. However, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled that although it cannot strike the law down, the courts can still adjudicate whether or not the law is unconstitutional and make a declaration as such.
These laws place deeply personal decisions in the hands of the government and schools. They force gender-diverse young people to choose between being outed to their parents/guardians or be misgendered and deadnamed at school. This seriously interferes with students’ dignity and autonomy. Both cases are still being litigated and have yet to reach a final determination. Nevertheless, the CCLA believes these laws are unconstitutional and violate students’ rights.